Home / Field Notes

ERP

Budgeting in SAP and IFS — Why Did It Stay Weak in Turkish ERPs?

In SAP CO and IFS, a budget is not a report but a control mechanism. Three reasons it stayed weak in Turkish ERPs: accounting culture, SME scale and the dominance of the Uniform Chart of Accounts.

Product
SAP · IFS · Logo · Netsis · Mikro · Uyumsoft
Level
Intermediate
Reading
~5 min

Budget types in SAP and IFS

On the SAP CO side:

Cost Center Budget
Internal Order Budget
Project Budget

In IFS:

Cost Center Budget
Project Budget
Activity Budget

A budget is not just a report

For example:

Production Department
Electricity Expense
Annual Budget = 1,200,000 TRY

When the actual comes in at:

1,250,000 TRY

the system can:

  • raise a warning,
  • block the transaction,
  • request approval.

This is corporate cost control.

Why did it stay weak in Turkish ERPs?

In my view there are three main reasons.

1. Turkish accounting culture

Most companies see their ERP not as a management system but as a:

Tax return generator

So the question becomes:

“Does it produce the VAT return?”

Not:

“What is the press shop’s electricity budget variance?”

2. A customer base dominated by SMEs

The historical customers of Logo, Mikro and Netsis are companies of 20, 50 or 100 people. In these companies:

General Manager
=
Finance Manager
=
Purchasing Manager

can be the same person. The need for budget control is low.

3. The dominance of the Uniform Chart of Accounts

For years in Turkey, analysis was done like this:

770.01 Personnel
770.02 Electricity
770.03 Rent

As a result, the Cost Element concept never developed.

Someone who uses SAP or IFS naturally asks: “Why is the electricity expense kept inside the account code?” A fair question.

The biggest gap, in my view

Even today, what is missing in systems such as Logo, Netsis, Mikro and Uyumsoft is not the budget module itself. What is missing is that the trio of:

Dimensional Accounting
+
Cost Accounting
+
Budget Control

has not been built into the heart of the ERP.

For someone who has used IFS for years, it is normal to see on a single accounting line:

Account
Cost Center
Cost Element
Project
Activity

In Turkey, on the other hand, many companies still try to do analysis through account breakdowns like:

770.01.001
770.01.002
770.01.003

That is why I always say: Turkish ERPs evolved from accounting systems into ERPs; SAP and IFS were born from the logic of cost accounting and enterprise resource planning. That is the root of the architectural difference between them.

SAP is a registered trademark of SAP SE; IFS and IFS Applications of IFS AB; Logo, Netsis, Mikro and Uyumsoft of their respective companies. This note is an independent assessment.